Toyota Class Motion Alleges Automaker Offered 2021 Venzas With Faulty Windshields

(Picture Credit score: FotograFFF/Shutterstock)

Toyota Venza Windshields Class Motion Lawsuit Overview: 

  • Who: Heather A. Davis and Robert Sweeny filed a category motion lawsuit towards Toyota Motor Gross sales, U.S.A., Inc.
  • Why: Davis and Sweeny declare Toyota knowingly bought 2021 Toyota Venza automobiles containing faulty windshields that may crack, chip or fracture for no or little cause. 
  • The place: The lawsuit was filed in Texas federal court docket. 

Toyota bought 2021 Venza automobiles it knew contained faulty windshields that may crack, chip or fracture, a brand new class motion lawsuit alleges. 

Plaintiffs Heather A. Davis and Robert Sweeny declare Toyota knew there was a difficulty with the Toyota Venza windshields in the course of the manufacturing course of however failed to repair the issue earlier than promoting the automobiles to the general public. 

“Throughout the prerelease evaluation stage of the Class Automobiles, Toyota would have identified that the windshield chosen for the Class Automobiles was faulty and would pose a security threat to house owners/lessees and the motoring public,” the category motion lawsuit states. 

Davis and Sweeny declare the windshields will both fail for “no cause in any respect” or resulting from an incident that will not trigger a difficulty for a “non-defective windshield,” resembling a “very slight impression.” 

The defect usually reveals itself instantly after a driver takes possession of the car, the category motion lawsuit alleges. 

Toyota Received’t Restore Faulty Windshields Below Its Guarantee, Class Motion Says

Regardless of this, Toyota refuses to restore the windshields below its guarantee, requiring car house owners to pay out of pocket for brand new windshields, that are additionally faulty, inflicting the necessity for a number of replacements, the category motion lawsuit alleges

Davis claims she has needed to get 4 alternative windshields on her 2021 Toyota Venza inside the span of 1 12 months. 

Along with inflicting monetary harm, Davis and Sweeny argue the defect additionally places the well being of drivers, passengers and others on the highway at risk. 

“The Windshield Defect poses an excessive security hazard to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians as a result of a spontaneously shattering or cracking windshield can impair the driving force’s view, distract the driving force, and end in dislodged glass that may injure drivers, passengers and pedestrians,” the category motion lawsuit states. 

Davis and Sweeny declare Toyota is responsible of fraudulent concealment and unjust enrichment and in violation of the Magnuson-Moss Guarantee Act, the Texas Misleading Practices Act and the Arizona Shopper Fraud Act, amongst different issues. 

Davis and Sweeny need to characterize a nationwide class and a Texas and Arizona subclass of people who’re present or former house owners or lessees of a 2021 Toyota Venza. 

Plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and requesting equitable reduction together with precise, incidental, consequential and punitive damages for themselves and all class members. 

Toyota has had points with its Venza automobiles prior to now. Final 12 months, the corporate recalled 279,040 of its mannequin 12 months 2009-15 Toyota Venza SUVs over issues their airbags might fail to deploy

Do you personal or lease a 2021 Toyota Venza? Tell us within the feedback! 

The plaintiffs are represented by Jody B. Burton of Lemberg Regulation, L.L.C.

The Toyota Venza Windshields Class Motion Lawsuit is Davis, et al. v. Toyota Motor Gross sales, U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 4:22-cv-00090, within the U.S. District Court docket for the Jap District of Texas.



Lea sobre más demandas colectivas y acuerdos de demanda colectiva:

Te contamos sobre el dinero que puedes reclamar CADA SEMANA! Suscríbase a nuestro boletín de noticias gratuito.

Nota: Prime Class Actions no es un administrador de acuerdos
administrador o bufete de abogados. Prime Class Actions es una fuente de noticias legales
que informa sobre demandas colectivas, acuerdos de demandas colectivas,
demandas por lesiones de medicamentos y demandas por responsabilidad de productos. Prime Class
Actions no procesa reclamaciones y no podemos asesorarle sobre el
sobre el estado de una demanda colectiva. Debe ponerse en contacto con el
con el administrador del acuerdo o con su abogado para cualquier
sobre el estado de su reclamación, el formulario de reclamación o preguntas sobre cuándo se espera que se envíen los pagos.
de los pagos.



Entradas relacionadas

¿Qué cubre la Ley del Limón de Nueva York?

Mitsubishi Class Motion Alleges Automaker Knowingly Offered 2022 Outlander Automobiles Containing Faulty Hoods

Toyota Class Motion Alleges Automaker Offered 2021 Venzas With Faulty Windshields

Recall Test: Teslas Recalled Over Windshield Defect

GM, Ford Take Prime Spots for the Most Auto Recollects in 2021

Allstate Class Motion Claims Insurer Unfairly Profited From Pandemic With Its Auto Insurance coverage Premiums

Recall Test: Audi, Porsche Recall Greater than 32K Automobiles As a result of Axle Alignment Concern

What Automobiles Are Lined By The South Carolina Lemon Regulation?

Nissan Titan Class Motion Alleges ‘Critical Defects’ Trigger Engine Failure, Exhaust Leak

Tesla Recollects Extra Than 800K Automobiles Over Seat Belt Chime Concern

Tesla, Dealing with Huge Recall, Has Lengthy Historical past of Reliability Points

​​​​Recall Test: Tesla Recollects Nearly 54K Self-Driving Automobiles As a result of Rolling-Cease Crash Threat

¿Cómo puedo presentar una reclamación de la Ley del Limón?

FCA Class Motion Claims Firm Manufactured, Offered Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram Automobiles With Faulty V6 Engines

Kia Recollects 410K Vehicles, Minivans Over Airbag Downside

Jaguar Land Rover Faulty Timing Chains Class Motion Settlement

Ford Explorer Exhaust Defect Class Motion Settlement

¿Qué es la Ley del Limón en Florida?

Recall Test: 690K Nissan Rogue SUVs Recalled As a result of Fireplace Threat

Ford Hybrid Battery Defect Class Motion Lawsuit Investigation